I’ve wrestled with this issue because of the struggle I’ve had to find natural compassion for the spiritually lost. I’m deeply troubled over the fact that I find it much easier to judge and condemn people than show Christ’s love to them. I struggle with the problem of pointing people to Christ without giving the appearance of approving of their sin. I’m trying to learn Christ’s way of touching the lives of people the way He did, showing them unconditional love while at the same time making it clear that their sin displeases God. The only difference here is that I am not Jesus, and I most certainly am not sinless. This is why it’s so important for me to keep in mind the words of Scripture that the truth will set us free (John 8:32). Christ came to set people free from the control of sin, not just its penalty.
I think of the words of Jesus to the woman caught in adultery: “Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more.”(John 8:11) Jesus was never about excusing away sin any more than He was about simply damning people to hell. He always sought to give people the opportunity to repent of sin and turn to Him to become all that He wanted them to be. The same is true today even in a culture that increasingly doesn’t even want to hear about or be confronted for sin. The need to help people understand what is displeasing to God has never been greater. Yet to find a way to explain that in love is also proving to be a greater challenge than ever.
When it comes to this matter of speaking to LGBTQ rights activists, I’ve had other believers including family members tell me repeatedly that instead of getting angry and showing bitterness and rage toward them, we need to be ready to share the truth with those who are caught up in these lifestyle problems, doing so in a loving, compassionate way. I certainly agree with this in principle. In practical reality however, it isn’t holding up. Too many of the gay men I’ve run into are so thoroughly steeped in the lifestyle, that they are only interested in finding more queer sex partners, not listening to someone share the Gospel with them.
That doesn’t mean there are no spiritually hungry people among practicing homosexual, bisexual, and transgender people, I’m aware there are some among the LGBTQ movement who are questioning it, wrestling with doubts about the rightness of it, and some who are choosing to leave the lifestyle and movement behind. This of course, enrages leaders in the movement, especially those who also happen to be Marxists, and who are using the issues of sexual orientation and gender identity as marquee causes to support and ultimately help push the utopian delusion of Karl Marx. Individuals who have left the gay lifestyle or who have switched back to their birth gender have found themselves the targets of angry threats and expressions of outright hate for defecting from the movement. These LGBTQ activists become guilty of the very thing they call those who disagree with them as “homophobes.”
Even as the Equality Act has been debated in Congress, and questions about sex education curriculum introduced into our schools backed by LGBTQ rights activists are raised by parents, I come back to a foundational question: Does anybody know or care what God thinks of this LGBTQ rights movement and what they’re promoting? I know this involves a sharp debate between Darwinist secular humanists, and proponents of the Judeo-Christian worldview. But when we lay the debate aside, and look at the two competing points, another question arises: Which takes more faith to believe, that we humans and every other living creature on the earth evolved by random chance out of the primordial slime, or were formed out of the dust of the ground by an all-wise, intelligent Designer, a creator-God?
This question lies at the heart of the whole debate over human sexuality. Are we evolving toward all becoming queer, with human reproduction only accomplished by artificial insemination, or are we designed by the Creator to be heterosexual only with all the other variations in sexual behavior developing after humanity turned its back on that Creator? If we follow the first view, than any form of human behavior is justifiable, sexual or otherwise. If we follow the second, then we must conclude that there are standards of conduct established by that all-wise Creator-God that come to us in the form of absolute truth. When I look around at this world and all the different complex life forms that exist upon it, especially humans with the way we’re made, I find it vastly more difficult to believe that we and everything else around us just evolved by chance, than I do that an intelligent, all-wise and all-powerful Creator formed and fashioned us.
So how do I and others who follow Christ as Lord and Savior speak to those who are a part of this Marxist-based, LGBTQ rights movement? I think we have to start with pointing out the differences in the two worldviews that reflect the thinking of the two camps. We have to start by explaining what, from what we know about their lives from history, that Charles Darwin, and Karl Marx grew up under in their religious backgrounds. Both came to hate religion, especially Christianity. Darwin turned against the Christian faith when God did not answer a prayer request of his affirmatively. Marx began to hate all religion, and Christianity in particular, when his Jewish father decided to convert from Judaism to the Lutheran Church for the sake of greater economic prosperity by gaining favor with other Germans. The end result was that Karl grew up rejecting all organized religion as “the opiate of the masses,” and developed his atheist political ideology on the basis of that hatred for religion, particularly the Christian faith, which he saw as the source of all “systemic evils” as he called them, especially capitalism.
Darwin developed his theory of evolution out of his contempt for God and the Christian faith, by postulating that all of the world and universe, including humanity, evolved by random chance. In recent decades, the greater scientific community has declared Darwin’s theory to be proven fact, with anyone disagreeing instantly attacked and labelled as “anti-science, and anti-intellectual.” The problem is, scientists who vehemently assert that a concept which is still based on assumptions and not absolute proven fact, cease to be scientists and become politicians. When those assumptions are rooted in hatred and bitterness toward God and faith, as they were with Darwin, then the would ends up with an anti-democratic system of thought disguised as science that proves not only insulting to people of faith, but de-humanizing and destructive to the world in general.
When I speak of evolutionary theory, I am not referring to the concept of microevolution, the process in which species adapt and mutate to accommodate or adjust to changes in their environment. We see plenty of evidence for this in nature. But the problem lies with the concept of macroevolution in which species form and evolve from lower forms of life. This theory was really Darwin’s way of rejecting the existence of a Creator-God along with the supernatural. But just because one chooses to reject the existence of God or a spirit world doesn’t mean they cease to be. Again, I see far more evidence for the existence of the supernatural than I do for only a material world and universe.
Karl Marx was delighted to grab hold of Darwin’s theory and apply it to his atheistic political philosophy, based upon his concept of dialectic materialism. In his assault on both capitalism and religion (mainly Christianity) Marx sought to form a whole new worldview that not only rejected the existence of God and the supernatural, but to push the world rapidly and violently toward the evolution of a one-world, anarchistic society with no economy, no laws, no government, no religion, and no morality. It would be a world in which all the remaining people on earth not eliminated by the mass genocide he advocated to achieve this society he called Utopia, would learn to live in perfect harmony with each other, with no conflicts, no competition between people, and no one claiming ownership over anything. In light of how we humans have behaved toward each other over the centuries, this utopian concept is childish at best, and demonic at worst. A perfectly harmonious, Godless society is not even a remote possibility in light of what we know of human nature, especially if it is bought at the price of massive bloodshed, which is what Marx called for.
This brings me back to the issue of the LGBTQ rights movement and its efforts to se everyone in this country and ultimately the world, embracing the idea of all people “evolving” into queers, to create the utopian society they wish to see develop. The first and obvious problem with this is the matter of reproduction. There is no guarantee that artificial insemination is always going to work, and if so many people, especially men, have been eliminated through a worldwide Marxist revolution, the possibility is very real and great the human race itself could die out and become extinct. Furthermore, the massive and bloody revolution Marx called for would most likely result in the total annihilation of humanity.
This brings me back to the Judeo-Christian view and its focus on an Almighty, Sovereign, holy Creator-God. While I can’t prove His existence to anyone, I can say that if you decide to seek Him out yourself because you really want to know He’s for real, you will find Him. He will make Himself known to you, and provide the way for you to come to Him through His Son, Jesus Christ. He knows you inside out, and there’s nothing you can hide from Him. As for His nature and character, God is changeless and so is His written Word, the Bible. As our Creator, He determined how we were to function sexually with one man married to one woman, in order to both reproduce and provide a stable home environment. It is we humans, after our first father and mother sinned, who started heading down all kinds of dark paths in our quests for sexual pleasure.
Contrary to what some theologians assert today, neither God, nor our understanding of Him are evolving with the changes in culture. Here again, the destructive nature of social Darwinism and Marxism has worked into the thinking of much of today’s church, affecting so many who have listened to such teaching that instead of God making us in His own image, we try to re-create God into our image. This in turn, leads to all kinds of heresies, including the idea that we can live sexually any way we see fit, and God will just smile upon it. No, what God established for men and women at creation has not changed. It still is: one man with one woman, until death parts them.
The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever (Hebrews 13:8). Whether one believes in Him or not, He is returning to this earth one day. When He does, time will have run out to make things right with Him, if one doesn’t pass away in death first. One of the myths of Marxism is that there is no soul, and when humans die, they simply cease to exist. But there are too many people whose hearts stopped, were temporarily dead, and who found out otherwise, to dismiss the idea of a soul. Our souls live on for eternity, even though are bodies don’t. The question is, Where will your soul spend eternity? It will either be spent in the glorious eternal presence of God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or it will be spent in eternal darkness and torment. The choice is ours to make, even as the Holy Spirit, convicts us of our sin. If God’s Spirit is speaking to you about your sin, will you respond to Him? Just pray this prayer:
Lord Jesus, I confess that I am a sinner and need Your forgiveness. I want to turn away from my sins and live for You. Please forgive me, cleanse me of my sins, and fill me with Your Spirit that I may have the power to live for You. In Your Name, Amen.